Colorado's Electrical Climate Goals
A detailed review of the legislatively mandated goals. And the price.
Colorado's Clean Energy Future: What the Legislation Means for Your Power and Pocketbook
Colorado has consistently positioned itself as a national leader in renewable energy, driven by a commitment to environmental stewardship and the pursuit of economic opportunities.1 The state has enacted ambitious, legally mandated goals to transition its electricity sector away from fossil fuels, aiming for a cleaner, more sustainable power grid.
This transformation is not a recent phenomenon; Colorado's journey began nearly two decades ago with early Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) that progressively increased targets, demonstrating a long-term, accelerating commitment to clean energy.4 This sustained trajectory indicates a deeply embedded political and regulatory resolve to pursue clean energy, suggesting that significant policy reversals are unlikely despite potential challenges.
This discussion will break down the key legislation driving this transformation, explore its expected impacts on electricity bills and grid reliability, and examine the built-in flexibilities and potential challenges, particularly in the face of shifting federal support.
Decoding Colorado's Climate Legislation: The Mandates
Colorado's clean energy goals are enshrined in several pivotal pieces of legislation, each contributing to a comprehensive strategy for decarbonizing the electricity sector.
House Bill 19-1261: Setting Economy-Wide Emission Reduction Targets
This foundational law establishes broad, economy-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets for Colorado, relative to 2005 levels: a 26% reduction by 2025, 50% by 2030, and 90% by 2050.2 These targets encompass all sectors, including electricity generation, transportation, and buildings, making the electricity sector's transformation fundamental to broader climate action.2
While HB19-1261 does not directly dictate specific utility actions, it provides the overarching framework that compels the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and individual utilities to develop plans for substantial emissions reductions in the power sector.
This indirect pressure drives investments that will ultimately influence electricity bills and grid reliability. As an economy-wide target, HB19-1261 does not include specific utility-level off-ramps; however, the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) is delegated authority to adopt rules to meet these targets.3
Senate Bill 19-236: Utility Clean Energy Plans and the PUC's Central Role
This bill introduces a "clean energy overlay" on the Electric Resource Plan (ERP) process, mandating that utilities submit Clean Energy Plans (CEPs). Key targets include an 80% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from electricity sales by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and a long-term goal of 100% clean energy resources by 2050, or sooner if practicable.5
The PUC plays a central role in this process, reviewing and approving these plans with the aim of achieving a "cost-effective mix of resources".5 However, achieving these ambitious reductions necessitates substantial investments in new generation capacity and infrastructure, which are projected to drive up electricity rates for consumers.6
The PUC's approval process also ensures that "sufficient generation will be available to meet customer needs," emphasizing the importance of maintaining grid reliability throughout the transition.5 The PUC's dual mandate—balancing ambitious climate goals with the practical realities of cost and reliability—positions it as a critical arbiter.
A significant provision within SB19-236 is the "safe harbor" clause: if the PUC approves a CEP that achieves at least a 75% emission reduction by 2030, the utility is exempt from additional AQCC regulations for the power sector through 2030.5 This provides a degree of regulatory certainty.
Furthermore, the 100% clean energy goal for 2050 is explicitly conditioned on being "technically and economically feasible".5 These "safe harbor" and "feasibility" clauses are legislative acknowledgments that the 100% goal is conditional, providing flexibility to prevent undue economic or reliability burdens. This empowers the PUC to adjust the pace and cost of the transition if the impacts become too severe.
Senate Bill 23-198: Strengthening Clean Energy Plan Verification
Signed into law in June 2023, this recent bill enhances the verification process for Clean Energy Plans.8 It requires utilities to achieve at least a 46% reduction in GHG emissions from electricity sales by 2027 relative to 2005 levels, in addition to the 2030 target.9
The bill mandates independent confirmation of utility data by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), with provisions for public access and comment.9 By increasing accountability and transparency, SB23-198 reinforces the commitment to meeting targets. This could indirectly affect costs if utilities face stricter requirements to procure resources or accelerate their transition.
While utilities are allowed to inform the CDPHE in writing of any "challenges" they encounter in achieving the 2030 target by March 31, 2026 9, this is primarily a reporting mechanism. However, if an entity fails to obtain necessary resources by December 31, 2028, the AQCC is mandated to adopt rules to limit GHG emissions to ensure targets are met.9
This legislative tightening of the reins moves beyond aspirational goals to concrete enforcement and verification, indicating a strong legislative intent to ensure targets are met, potentially through direct regulatory intervention if utilities fall short.
The Price Tag: Impact on Your Electricity Bills
Achieving Colorado's ambitious clean energy goals comes with a significant financial cost, primarily borne by electricity consumers.
What Climate Goals Must Be Achieved When
Colorado's legislative framework sets clear, escalating targets for greenhouse gas emission reductions and clean energy adoption in the electricity sector. These goals are interconnected, with economy-wide targets influencing utility-specific mandates.
Table 1: Colorado's Key Electricity Climate Goals & Timelines
Independent analyses project significant increases in electricity bills. The Common Sense Institute estimates that by 2030, the average Colorado household will spend an additional $390 to $504 annually, leading to a 56% increase in the average electricity rate, from 12 cents/kWh to 18.4 cents/kWh.6 This contrasts sharply with historical growth rates (4% between 2010-2020) and inflation (16% at 2.5% inflation).6 By 2040, the cumulative cost could reach $6,400 to $9,280 more per household.6
The PUC's own commissioned 30-Year Rate Model, developed with Concentric Energy Advisors, projects an average annual rate growth of 6.0% for 2024-2030, significantly higher than the 1.9% average from 2011-2023.7 This model indicates that long-term rate trends are "dominated by capital spending".7
While early clean energy policies sometimes led to customer savings, data indicates a significant inflection point: beginning in 2023, Colorado's average electricity price became higher due to policy differences compared to neighboring states, and the "biggest impacts... have yet to impact consumers".10
This suggests that the initial, easier gains from renewable adoption are giving way to the higher system integration costs of deeper decarbonization, including massive investments in new generation and transmission.
These projected increases are primarily driven by the massive investments required to build new wind, solar, and battery storage capacity (estimated 55,068 megawatts by 2040, with 45% storage and 41% wind/solar) and the simultaneous retirement of existing coal and natural gas power plants.6
Importantly, analyses indicate that electricity prices surge due to these large investments in new clean energy, not due to fluctuations in natural gas prices.6 Beyond direct electricity bills, the Common Sense Institute projects broader economic impacts, including a $2.6 billion slowdown in GDP by 2030, 25,000 fewer jobs, and a $1,380 decrease in real disposable income for a family of four.6
Keeping the Lights On: Reliability in Transition
Maintaining grid reliability is paramount as Colorado transitions to a cleaner energy mix. Integrating a high percentage of intermittent renewable sources like wind and solar presents inherent challenges, requiring careful planning and substantial infrastructure upgrades.
The "Pathways to Deep Decarbonization" report, while identifying wind, solar, and battery storage as the majority of the lowest cost pathway, also explicitly states the need for clean hydrogen and geothermal electricity to ensure affordability and reliability.11 This suggests that a purely intermittent renewable grid, even with storage, may face limitations in meeting reliability standards; indeed, one analysis of the wind/solar/battery scenario in the Pathways report noted it "barely meets reliability standards".13
A critical component for reliability is the "substantial expansion and upgrade of our existing transmission grid".11 Many clean energy resources are located far from population centers, necessitating significant new transmission infrastructure, which adds to both cost and development timelines. Local opposition to solar projects 14 can also create bottlenecks, delaying capacity build-out.
Reliability is not solely about having enough generation; it encompasses the type of generation, the transmission infrastructure to deliver it, and the management of demand. The state's focus on transmission upgrades 11 and demand-side solutions like building electrification and smart grid technologies 15 indicates a sophisticated understanding that reliability requires a multi-faceted approach beyond simply building more wind and solar farms.
Demand-side management, such as the adoption of heat pumps and grid-interactive technologies in buildings (driven by House Bill 22-1363), can play a crucial role. These measures can help balance the grid seasonally, increase utility system load factors, and potentially offset up to one-fifth of projected electric demand by 2030, thereby reducing peak summer loads and managing grid growth.15
Navigating the Road Ahead: Off-Ramps and Flexibility
Colorado's legislation, while ambitious, includes specific mechanisms that provide flexibility and allow for adjustments if the prescribed goals become technically or economically unfeasible, or if utilities encounter significant challenges.
Criteria Allowing the PUC to Not Meet Goals
The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) plays a crucial role in overseeing the clean energy transition. Its mandate is to ensure that utilities acquire a "cost-effective mix of resources" and that "sufficient generation will be available to meet customer needs".5 This dual responsibility inherently allows the PUC to balance environmental goals with economic and reliability considerations.
Table 2: Legislative Off-Ramps and Flexibility Clauses
The PUC's process for approving Electric Resource Plans (ERPs) involves two phases, including a determination of whether a utility's acquisition of resources is "prudent".5 This "prudence" review is a key mechanism for protecting ratepayers from unreasonable costs and ensuring that investments are justified, effectively giving the PUC discretion to condition or reject plans that do not meet cost-effectiveness or reliability criteria.
The presence of these off-ramps and the PUC's balancing role indicates a degree of pragmatism embedded within Colorado's ambitious climate policy. While the state is committed to its goals, it has built in mechanisms to prevent the energy transition from becoming economically crippling or jeopardizing grid stability.
This suggests that the ultimate outcome will likely be a compromise between aspirational targets and practical realities, rather than an unyielding pursuit of targets regardless of cost or reliability.
The Federal Wildcard: Impact of Subsidy Removal
The continued availability of federal clean energy subsidies, particularly those from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), is a critical variable influencing the cost and feasibility of Colorado's clean energy transition.
Likelihood That Goals Will Be Too Expensive (with Federal Subsidy Removal Calculation)
There is a significant likelihood that Colorado's clean energy goals will become considerably more expensive if federal wind and solar subsidies are removed as is presently planned by some federal proposals. Governor Polis and the Colorado Energy Office estimate that the repeal of IRA tax credits could increase household energy bills by approximately 10%, or about $180 annually per household by 2030.16
Other analyses corroborate this, with Princeton University's ZERO Lab estimating a $100-$160 per year increase by 2030, and the D.C.-based Clean Energy Buyers Association projecting a 4.7% increase by 2032 for the average Colorado household.18
Utilities warn that without federal support, many planned wind, solar, and battery storage projects – which they currently consider the cheapest way to add capacity – may not move forward unless utilities agree to pay higher prices, which would then be passed on to customers.18 The proposed federal budget bill would also disrupt the transfer of tax credits, a mechanism used by utilities like Xcel Energy to monetize incentives and reduce project costs.19
This effectively "socializes the costs" across the national economy, and their removal means Coloradans would bear the full burden.13 Despite claims of renewables being the "least expensive" source of electricity 20, the current financial viability of many large-scale clean energy projects in Colorado is demonstrably dependent on federal tax credits.18 The removal of these subsidies would not only increase direct costs to ratepayers but also send a "deeply destabilizing signal to free markets" 16, potentially slowing private investment and project development.
This implies that the "electrotech" momentum 1 is not yet fully self-sustaining financially without policy support, and the cost burden would shift almost entirely to state ratepayers.
While federal rollbacks are harmful, Colorado is finding ways to adapt through local funding and public-private partnerships.1 However, these efforts may not fully offset the loss of federal incentives, especially given that up to 30% of Colorado households are already considered "energy burdened" 16, meaning a large portion of their income is spent on electricity, heating, and cooling.
The fact that a significant portion of Colorado households are "energy burdened" adds a critical social equity dimension to the cost discussion. Higher electricity bills, especially those resulting from the removal of federal subsidies, would disproportionately impact these vulnerable populations, potentially exacerbating economic inequality.
Conclusion: Understanding Colorado's Energy Future
Colorado is on an ambitious, legally mandated path to transform its electricity grid, aiming for deep greenhouse gas reductions and a transition to clean energy by 2040-2050. This transition is driven by a strong commitment to climate action, coupled with a vision for economic growth and job creation.3
The journey, however, comes with a substantial price tag. While the state has historically benefited from lower energy costs, the current and projected investments in new wind, solar, and battery storage, alongside the retirement of fossil fuel plants, are expected to significantly increase electricity bills for Coloradans in the coming decades.6
Maintaining grid reliability is a core concern, addressed through investments in diverse clean energy sources, critical transmission upgrades, and demand-side management strategies.11 Crucially, Colorado's legislative framework includes built-in flexibilities and off-ramps, primarily through the Public Utilities Commission's oversight, to ensure that goals remain technically and economically feasible and do not unduly burden ratepayers or jeopardize reliability.5
The potential removal of federal clean energy subsidies represents a significant financial headwind, threatening to raise electricity costs further (by approximately 10% or $180 annually per household by 2030) and challenge the economic viability of projects.16 While Colorado is resilient and seeking alternative funding, this federal policy shift could make the transition considerably more expensive for state residents, especially for energy-burdened households.
Ultimately, Coloradans can expect a cleaner, more renewable electricity supply, which will contribute to improved air quality and public health 15, but it will likely come with higher electricity bills. The ongoing success of this transition will depend on continued strategic investment, technological advancements, and adaptive policy-making that navigates both market forces and political shifts to balance environmental aspirations with economic realities.
Works cited
Colorado's Clean Energy Commitment: Staying the Course Amid Federal Policy Shifts, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.fennemorelaw.com/colorados-clean-energy-commitment-staying-the-course-amid-federal-policy-shifts/
Climate & Energy | Colorado Energy Office, accessed June 23, 2025, https://energyoffice.colorado.gov/climate-energy
ROADMAP TO 100% - Colorado Energy Office, accessed June 23, 2025, https://energyoffice.colorado.gov/sites/energyoffice/files/documents/ROADMAPTO100%25RENEWABLE.pdf
Renewable Portfolio Standard -- Colorado – Policies - IEA, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.iea.org/policies/3671-renewable-portfolio-standard-colorado
Electric Resource Plans / Clean Energy Plan - Colorado Public Utilities Commission, accessed June 23, 2025, https://puc.colorado.gov/puc-home/energy-and-water/electric-resource-plans/clean-energy-plan
Future of Electricity Costs in Colorado - Common Sense Institute, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.commonsenseinstituteus.org/colorado/research/energy-and-our-environment/future-of-electricity-costs-in-colorado-
Electric Long Term Average Rate Forecasting Tool - Colorado Public Utilities Commission, accessed June 23, 2025, https://puc.colorado.gov/sites/puc/files/documents/CEA%20and%20PUC%20Slide%20Deck%20reduced2.pdf
CO SB198 | 2023 | Regular Session - LegiScan, accessed June 23, 2025, https://legiscan.com/CO/bill/SB198/2023
Clean Energy Plans | Colorado General Assembly, accessed June 23, 2025, https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb23-198
Costs of Colorado's Environmental and Emission Reduction Targets over 15 Years - Common Sense Institute, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.commonsenseinstituteus.org/colorado/research/energy-and-our-environment/costs-of-colorados-environmental-and-emission-reduction-targets-over-15-years-
Clean Energy Innovation in Colorado, accessed June 23, 2025, https://energyoffice.colorado.gov/clean-energy-innovation
Plans & Reports | Colorado Energy Office, accessed June 23, 2025, https://energyoffice.colorado.gov/plans-reports
Bureaucratic Green Energy Mandates to Cost Colorado Ratepayers $45 Billion, accessed June 23, 2025, https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/06/23/bureaucratic-green-energy-mandates-to-cost-colorado-ratepayers-45-billion/
Policy Memo: Colorado Legislature Recommended to Pass Preemptive Legislation to Protect the Development of Solar Energy from Local Restrictions, accessed June 23, 2025, https://cleanenergyforum.yale.edu/2025/02/14/policy-memo-colorado-legislature-recommended-to-pass-preemptive-legislation-to-protect
Colorado Is Poised to Adopt a Nation-Leading Building Decarbonization Standard - RMI, accessed June 23, 2025, https://rmi.org/colorado-is-poised-to-adopt-a-nation-leading-building-decarbonization-standard/
Republican Federal Budget Will Increase Energy Costs: Governor Polis Concerned By Proposed Federal Rollback of Clean Energy Funding and Money-Saving Initiatives - Colorado.gov, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.colorado.gov/governor/news/republican-federal-budget-will-increase-energy-costs-governor-polis-concerned-proposed-federal
Colorado governor, state energy office call out rollback of clean energy funding in GOP megabill | SummitDaily.com, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.summitdaily.com/news/colorado-governor-polis-energy-office-clean-energy-funding/
Utilities warn Republican budget bill would increase energy costs for Colorado households, accessed June 23, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/2025/06/04/republican-budget-bill-utilities-energy-costs-impact/
Big Pivots: Ways in Which the Budget Bill Would Pinch Colorado, accessed June 23, 2025, https://blog.advancedenergyunited.org/articles/big-pivots-ways-in-which-the-budget-bill-would-pinch-colorado
climate.colorado.gov, accessed June 23, 2025, https://climate.colorado.gov/colorado-goals-actions-main-page#:~:text=Colorado%20is%20committed%20to%20100,will%20come%20from%20renewable%20sources.
Colorado's Clean Energy Commitment: Staying the Course Amid Federal Policy Shifts, accessed June 23, 2025, http://www.fennemorelaw.com/colorados-clean-energy-